Within the first six discourses of the ECK Satsang
Discourses, Fourth Series, Harold Klemp invokes Paul Twitchell's
name 52 times. He seems to have overlooked 'The Law of the ECK'
which Paul Twitchell wrote of in the ECK Satsang Discourses, Second
Series. The ECK Satsang Discourses, Second Series, are still published
by ECKANKAR and are included in their study program in Year 10.
Klemp does not mention 'The Law of the ECK' once within Satsang
4. And with good reason as I shall describe below.
Here is 'The Law of the ECK' by Paul Twitchell:
This is one of the most inflexible of all the spiritual
laws for those seeking God. No one, not even the ECK Masters,
can ignore this law and still make progress on the path of ECK.
The path of love leads to enlightenment and freedom and the true
heavenly world, but the way of anger and a wicked tongue can bring
the chela to the tight clutches of the Kal forces." - Paul
Twitchell, pages 70-71, The ECK Satsang Discourses, Second Series.
In light of 'The Law of the ECK' how are we to view
Harold Klemp? Klemp claims to the the Living ECK Master yet he
has repeatedly broken 'The Law of the ECK' set down by his master;
the master to whom he refers to 52 times in his current discourse
series. How has he broken 'The Law of the ECK'? The following
quotes from The ECK Satsang Discourses, Fourth Series, by Harold
Klemp, will show Klemp's continual disobediance to 'The Law of
the ECK' to which, as Twitchell points out, even the ECK Masters
are subject to.
QUOTES from The ECK Satsang Discourses, Fourth
Series, By Harold Klemp (1996) followed by a comment from Raphael.
(words in parenthesis are added for clarification)
Raphael's Comment:This
comment could hurt the feeling of Kirpal. If he were still alive.
Perhaps it also hurts Singh's followers. But does Harold care?
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: This
comment is hurtful to clergy of various faiths. Klemp blames and
accuses without examples if that would make any difference. It
wouldn't because 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: This
is a mean statement, sure to injure those Eckists with low self-esteem.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Another
critical statement which runs the risk of harming the Eckists.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Claiming
that others are envious of you is finding fault. 'The Law of the
ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Klemp
criticizes the impatient Eckists, and faults them for the 'foolishness'
of their egos. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Klemp
blames others for their lack of accomplishments. He criticizes
initiates who voice their pain and grief. 'The Law of the ECK'
has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Klemp
criticizes the bibles of men, and the orthodox churches. Has Klemp
forgot that the churches are made of of people, and that the
bibles of men were written by people? 'The Law of the ECK' has
been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Klemp
attacks the priestcraft, accusing and blaming them to be the pretenders
of truth. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Harold
criticizes certain Eckists as self-serving, and points out the
bickering that is occuring. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Direct
blame and criticism of his own followers. 'The Law of the ECK'
has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Harold
points out the fault of candidates on the 'threshold' of the path.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Klemp
criticizes whole groups of Eckists as only reading half the message,
and points out their negativity (hackles). 'The Law of the ECK'
has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: A direct
maligning and criticism of certain Eckists. 'The Law of the ECK'
has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Harold
criticizes the self-righteous group of Eckists standing in God
on Earth's way. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Harold
must be angry about something. This RIP against Eckists is pointedly
critical. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Another
extreme RIP by the RIPmeister Harold Klemp. 'The Law of the ECK'
has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Make
your point Harold. This is just a subtle criticism of your initiates.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Once
again ignoring 'The Law of the ECK', Klemp tells certain Eckists
that they are rigid and vain. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Monkeys?
In a zoo? Remember 'The Law of the ECK' states that one should
never hurt the feelings of anyone, man or ANIMAL (eck monkeys
included). 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Blame
and hidden shame in the words of the self-proclaimed God on Earth.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
"Paul restated the fact that as a young man
he got the First Initiation from Sudar Singh. The second came
from Rebazar Tarzs, and the Rod of ECK Power was
passed to him in 1965 by Rebazar.
Paul said, 'I have not had any other initiations from anyone, and even if it were so, they would be
worthless because only the ECK Masters can give initiations. Any other initiation is like a baptism.'
On September 9, 1971, just days before his translation,
Paul wrote to Kirpal Singh ion Delhi, India, that he never recognized him as a Master, or that he could
give initiations, and his work was not in the best interest of spirituality.
Your teachings are orthodox, and as a preacher you are not capable of assisting anyone spiritually. Even
your titles always seem fabricated,' said Paul.
Singh was guilty of trying to hold Paul in psychic bondage. Records that claimed to show that Paul was a member of Singh's ashram were further declared to be forgeries, as were papers with Paul's supposed signature. No more did Paul want to get threatening mail or suffer other harassments.
This exchange of correspondence points to the barrage of criticism that is thrown at one who enters into the
state of the Mahanta Consciousness." - pages 20-21
Raphael's Comment: This
whole story, even if the correspondence is true and is on file,
and verifiable, is critical, unkind, and obviously self-serving.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Come
now Harold, bumbler? Did you forget sloppy, ignorant,
half-hearted, monkey, losers, etc. Better pull out your 'put-down' thesaurus
and review it. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Is
this kind? Harold blames others for blaming others, and criticizes
those wallowing in self-pity, those souls in need of COMPASSION
not CRITICISM. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken. (What are
you so angry about Harold?)
Raphael's Comment: Who
is the man on the street? 99.99999% of humanity who are not initiates
of Eckankar. This criticism of the 'everyman' is subtle but real.
'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Raphael's Comment: Now
how can a master (Harold?) tell exactly who and what is making
a problem without finding fault and blaming someone either to
their face or behind their back? 'The Law of the ECK' has been
broken.
Raphael's Comment: Much
to their grief? Seems Klemp is happy that his ex-coworkers felt
pain. 'The Law of the ECK' has been broken.
Because of Klemp's clear and repeated breaking of
'The Law of the ECK', it behooves all Eckists to call for his
removal from the position he holds in name only and not in truth,
the Living ECK Master. As Rebazar Tarzs states in Stranger By
the River:
Peace and growth,
Click here to return to Recovery Room home page
Conclusion:
Raphael.